Case study - Somatic symptom disorder: Nursing

Nurse Heidi works in a primary care office and is caring for Katya, a 43-year-old with a history somatic symptom disorder. After introducing herself, Nurse Heidi goes through the steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model to make clinical decisions about Katya’s care by recognizing and analyzing cues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes. 

First, Nurse Heidi recognizes important cues. She obtains Katya’s vital signs, which are temperature 98.6 F, or 37 C, heart rate 75 beats per minute, respirations 16 breaths per minute, and blood pressure 110/70 mmHg. Katya also states she's having dull lower back pain, which comes and goes, that she rates at 4 out of 10 on a numeric pain scale. Nurse Heidi then gathers additional information from Katya. 

Nurse Heidi: Katya, tell me about what brought you to the office today. 

Katya: Well, same thing as in the past. I keep having back pain that comes and goes even though my health care provider ran several tests and told me nothing is wrong. It never goes away, and I don’t know what to do. 

Nurse Heidi: Tell me about how this pain affects your daily life. 

Katya: I’m not able to do things I used to love doing, like hanging out with my friends, because I’m always worried my pain will return. So, I end up staying home alone all day instead. 

Nurse Heidi: That sounds difficult and isolating. 

Next, Nurse Heidi analyzes the cues. She reviews the electronic health record, or EHR, and notes that Katya is diagnosed with somatic symptom disorder. She also sees that the health care provider recommended counseling, but Katya declined.  

Nurse Heidi knows that patients with somatic symptom disorder experience physical symptoms that aren’t explained by any known physical or psychiatric conditions. She also understands that patients with this disorder are unable to cope with their unpleasant emotions and instead, displace them into physical symptoms, like pain and weakness as well as cognitive symptoms, like persistent thoughts, worry, and anxiety.  

Nurse Heidi realizes Katya needs support and resources to promote effective coping. 

Now, using the information she gathered, along with Katya’s medical history, Nurse Heidi chooses a priority hypothesis of ineffective coping.  

Then, she generates solutions to address Katya’s ineffective coping that will include both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, and she establishes the expected outcome that after intervening, Katya will participate in strategies to effectively manage her symptoms by her one month follow-up appointment.  

Nurse Heidi then takes action to implement these solutions. First, she speaks to the health care provider about her assessment findings, who then orders escitalopram and counseling for Katya.  

After the health care provider speaks with Katya about the updated plan of care, Nurse Heidi reenters her room. 

Nurse Heidi: Katya, I want to talk with you about your health care provider’s recommendations and answer any questions you have. 

Katya: Okay.