Case study - Stroke: Nursing

1,102views

Notes

CASE STUDY - STROKE

KEY POINTS
NOTES
INTRODUCTION
  • Neurology unit
  • 67-year-old man
  • History: hyperlipidemia
  • Admitted for stroke

RECOGNIZING AND ANALYZING CUES
  • Recognize cues
    • Temperature: 98.8 F (37.1 C)
    • Heart rate: 98
    • Respirations: 16
    • Blood pressure: 146/92 mmHg
    • Oxygen saturation: 96% room air
    • Pain: 0/10
    • Unilateral facial drooping
    • Favoring right hand
    • Mixing up words
  • Analyze cues
    • Ischemic stroke
    • Hyperlipidemia contributing factor to stroke
    • Loss of oxygenated blood flow to brain causes damage to areas that control language and motor functions

PRIORITIZING HYPOTHESES, GENERATING SOLUTIONS, AND TAKING ACTIONS
  • Priority hypothesis
    • Impaired communication
  • Generate solutions
    • Effectively communicate needs
  • Take action
    • Collaborate with speech therapist
    • Introduce communication board

EVALUATING OUTCOMES
  • Temperature: 98.0 F (36.7 C)
  • Heart rate: 78
  • Respirations: 15
  • Blood pressure: 130/90
  • Oxygen saturation: 98% room air
  • More comfortable describing needs using communication board
  • Demonstrates use
  • Outcome met

Transcript

Watch video only

Nurse Darius works on a neurology unit and is caring for Calvin, a 67-year-old male with a history of hyperlipidemia who was recently admitted following a stroke. After settling Calvin in his room, Nurse Darius goes through the steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model to make clinical decisions about Calvin’s care by recognizing and analyzing cues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes

First, Nurse Darius recognizes important cues including Calvin’s vital signs which are temperature 98.8 F, or 37.1 C, heart rate 98 beats per minute, respirations 16 breaths per minute, blood pressure 146/92 mmHg, and oxygen saturation 96 percent on room air.   He rates his pain level is 0 out of 10.  

Nurse Darius also notes that the left side of Calvin’s face is drooping and sees that he favors his right hand. Nurse Darius also overhears Calvin mixing up his words while trying to talk to the dietary staff about his lunch tray.  

Next, Nurse Darius analyzes these cues. He reviews the electronic health record, or EHR, and sees Calvin has undergone an MRI of his head. The results show that Calvin had an ischemic stroke, where an occlusion in his artery caused inadequate blood flow to his brain.  

Nurse Darius knows Calvin’s hyperlipidemia was likely a contributing factor to his stroke, since it can lead to atherosclerosis and blockage of arteries.  

He also knows the loss of oxygenated blood flow to the brain can cause damage to areas that control language and motor functions and lead to muscle weakness and aphasia.  

Nurse Darius recognizes that he needs to effectively communicate with Calvin to properly care for him. 

Now, using the information he’s gathered, Nurse Darius chooses a priority hypothesis of impaired communication.   

Then, he generates solutions to address Calvin’s impaired communication that will include nonpharmacologic interventions; and he establishes the outcome that after intervening, Calvin will effectively communicate his needs by the end of the shift.  

Nurse Darius then takes action to implement these solutions.  First, he collaborates with the speech therapist to use a communication board to compensate for Calvin’s new communication limitations.  

Sources

  1. "Lewis's medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems. (12th ed.)" Elsevier (2022)
  2. "Medical-surgical nursing: Concepts for interprofessional and collaborative care. (10th ed.)" Elsevier (2021)
  3. "Lewis’s medical-surgical nursing in Canada: Assessment and management of clinical problems. (5th ed.)" Elsevier (2023)