Health disparities: Race and ethnicity

Watch video only
. Across many health conditions, differences in disease burden, access to care, and health outcomes can be observed between racial and ethnic groups.
Understanding these disparities requires looking beyond biology alone. Social, cultural, historical, and structural factors all contribute to the health experiences of individuals and populations.
Examining these influences can help healthcare professionals better understand health disparities and identify opportunities to promote more equitable care.
Let's start with a few key definitions. Race is a social construct used to group people based primarily on physical characteristics such as skin color, hair texture, or facial features.
On the other hand, ethnicity refers to a shared cultural background and may include language, customs, traditions, national origin, and religion.
Now racism includes attitudes, behaviors, or systems that disadvantage people based on race or even ethnicity. Structural racism occurs when institutions, policies, and social systems systematically benefit some groups while disadvantaging others.
Racism can be overt and covert. Overt racism involves obvious discriminatory behaviors or attitudes, while covert racism is more subtle and may occur through unconscious processes such as implicit bias.
Speaking of which, implicit bias refers to unconscious attitudes or stereotypes that influence understanding, actions and decisions.
In health care, implicit bias can affect communication, trust, clinical decision making, and patient outcomes. Another important concept is stereotype threat.
Stereotype threat occurs when individuals fear being judged according to a negative stereotype about their group. In healthcare settings, stereotype threat may increase anxiety, reduce trust, and make patients and colleagues less likely to fully engage in care.
Let's look at a case highlighting these concepts. Abby is a 32 year old black woman who is pregnant with her first baby.
She has excellent health insurance, a stable job, and has received regular prenatal care. When she goes into labor, her usual obstetrician is unavailable, and she is cared for by a different physician she has never met before.
As her labor progresses, Abby repeatedly reports severe pain and expresses concern that something is wrong. The physician reassures her, saying, Labor is painful.
Everything appears to be progressing normally. Abby continues to feel that something is wrong, but her concerns are not further investigated.
Later, Abby calls her mother for support. Her mother arrives and requests additional evaluation, asking, Something doesn't seem right.
Can someone reassess her? The nurse responds.
We've already evaluated her. You need to give the team time to do their job.
As Abby's mother continues to advocate for her daughter, healthcare team members begin describing her assertive behavior as aggressive rather than recognizing it as a concern for her daughter's well-being.
Several hours later, a significant decline in the fetal heart rate is recognized. An emergency cesarean section is performed, but despite intensive care, the infant dies from complications related to oxygen deprivation.
So what can this case tell us about racial and ethnic health disparities? Could this outcome have been prevented?
Of course, unexpected complications can arise in any pregnancy. However, cases like Abby's raise important questions about factors that may contribute to differences in health outcomes between racial and ethnic groups.
There are several key aspects of her experience. First, Abby's pain concerns were minimized despite repeated attempts to communicate them.
Then requests for further evaluation were dismissed and finally her mother's advocacy was perceived negatively rather than as concern for her daughter's well-being.
Experiences like these have been linked to concepts such as implicit bias and structural racism. While any individual interaction may have multiple explanations, looking at patterns across large populations helps researchers identify and understand racial and ethnic health and health care disparities.
In the United States, black infants experience substantially higher rates of infant mortality than white infants. These disparities persist despite overall improvements in infant mortality and remain even after accounting for differences in income and education.
OK, let's talk a bit more about structural racism. Structural racism contributes to health disparities by influencing other structural and social determinants of health.
Differences in access to education, employment, housing, transportation, and health care can create unequal opportunities for health.
Additional factors may also contribute to disparities. Distrust of health care systems, often rooted in historical experiences of discrimination and unethical treatment, may delay health care seeking and preventive care.
Chronic stress, sometimes referred to as allostatic load, can also contribute to poor physical and mental health outcomes over time.
Racial and ethnic health disparities can appear in many ways, including differences in disease burden, mortality, access to health care, and quality of care.
Understanding and addressing these disparities depends on how we collect and analyze data. One challenge is data aggregation, which occurs when multiple racial or ethnic groups are combined into a single category.
While this may simplify analysis, it can also hide important differences between groups. Data disaggregation separates data into more specific racial and ethnic categories, making disparities easier to identify and address.
Better data helps health care organizations, researchers, and policymakers understand where disparities exist and evaluate whether interventions are working.
At this point it may feel overwhelming to think about how individual healthcare professionals can address disparities that are rooted in broader social and structural factors.
However, there are several important ways clinicians can contribute. One approach is advocacy and allyship.
Health care professionals can support policies and initiatives that promote health equity, improve access to care, and reduce structural barriers that contribute to disparities.
Advocacy can occur at institutional, local, state, and national levels. Another important strategy is partnering with communities.
Health care professionals can work with community organizations and leaders to co-design culturally responsive programs that reflect the language, values, priorities, and experiences of the community they serve.
These partnerships can improve health education and strengthen trust between health care systems and the populations they serve.
Finally, increasing diversity within the healthcare workforce is another important strategy. Diverse healthcare teams can be better equipped to understand the experiences, perspectives, and needs of the populations they serve.
Greater representation within healthcare can also help strengthen trust, improve communication, and support more equitable care.
While advocacy, community partnerships, and workforce diversity can help address disparities at broader levels. Healthcare professionals can also make a difference through their interactions with individual patients.
Two important approaches are cultural formulation interviewing and trauma-informed care. Cultural formulation interviewing is a structured approach that helps clinicians understand how a patient's cultural background, values, and lived experiences shape their understanding of illness and treatment.
There are 4 main domains the cultural definition of the problem, the cultural perceptions of cause, context, and support, the cultural factors affecting coping and past help seeking, and the cultural features of the clinician-patient relationship.
Clinicians use questions from these domains to better understand how patients view their illness, what influences their health decisions, and how care can be aligned with their values, experiences, and needs.
Let's look at each one more closely. The cultural definition of the problem.
Refers to the patient describing their concern in their own words. Cultural perceptions of cause, context, and support explore what the patient thinks caused the problem, what makes it better or worse, who they turn to for support, and how their family or community understand the condition.
Cultural factors affecting coping and past help seeking examine what the patient has already tried and what types of care they prefer.
Finally, cultural features of the clinician-patient relationship explore whether differences in background or experiences may be affecting communication, trust, or care.
Cultural formulation interviewing should not be treated like a checklist. It works best when paired with cultural humility, which means recognizing that clinicians bring medical expertise while patients bring expertise about their own bodies, experiences, values, and goals.
Basically, cultural humility is acceptance that those outside of the patient's culture cannot fully understand and appreciate that culture.
Another important approach is trauma informed care. Trauma informed care recognizes that past trauma, discrimination, and chronic stress can affect health behaviors, trust, and health care interactions.
It emphasizes empathy, safety, trust, and avoiding re-traumatization. In Abby's case, a culturally responsive and trauma informed approach would have included listening carefully to her concerns, taking her pain seriously, recognizing the mother's advocacy as concerned, and reassessing when symptoms changed.
These approaches cannot eliminate disparities on their own, but they can improve communication, trust, and patient-centered care.
All right, as a quick recap, race is a social construct while ethnicity refers to a shared cultural background. Structural racism contributes to disparities by influencing access to opportunities, resources, and health care.
Implicit bias and stereotype threat can also affect health care interactions and patient experiences. Data disaggregation helps identify disparities that may be hidden when diverse groups are combined into broad categories.
Health care professionals can help reduce disparities through advocacy, community partnerships, workforce diversity, and culturally responsive care.
At the individual patient level, cultural formulation interviewing can help clinicians understand how culture influences a patient's experience while trauma informed care recognizes the effects of trauma and emphasizes empathy, safety, and