Video Case Study - Caring for Patients With Cholecystitis
Nurse Sandy works on a medical-surgical unit and is caring for Natasha, a 40-year-old female with a history of obesity who's been diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and is awaiting surgical intervention.
In collaboration with the registered nurse, RN Mark, Nurse Sandy goes through the steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model to make clinical decisions about Natasha's care by recognizing and analyzing cues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes.First, Nurse Sandy recognizes important cues, including Natasha’s vital signs, which are temperature 98.9 F or 37.1 C, heart rate 95 beats per minute, respirations 20 breaths per minute, blood pressure 109/83 mmHg, and pulse oximetry 99 percent on room air.
Natasha rates her pain at 3 on the pain scale. She sees that Natasha is holding an emesis bag, which contains a small amount of emesis.
Nurse Sandy also notices that Nastasha has IV fluids infusing into her peripheral IV.Nurse Sandy auscultates Natasha’s abdomen and notes active bowel sounds in all quadrants, which is consistent with RN Mark’s assessment.
She understands that cholecystitis refers to inflammation of the gallbladder, which is a small, pear-shaped organ located beneath the liver.
In patients with acute cholecystitis, bile or gallstones, which are made of bile that has hardened, build up inside the gallbladder, causing irritation of the mucosa lining its walls.
This also causes pressure in the gallbladder to increase, leading to wall distension and inflammation.Nurse Sandy then reviews the electronic health record, or EHR, and notes that Natasha initially presented to the emergency department with right upper quadrant pain and vomiting that occurred hours after eating fried chicken for dinner.
She also notes that Natasha is taking oral contraceptives, which Nurse Sandy recalls increases the risk for developing cholecystitis.Additionally, Nurse Sandy sees that, two hours ago, RN Mark gave Natasha a dose of morphine sulfate IV, but she has not received her PRN dose of ondansetron since yesterday.Nurse Sandy Nathasha needs effective management of nausea while she awaits her procedure.Now, using the information she's gathered, along with Natasha’s medical history, Nurse Sandy reports her findings to RN Mark, and together they choose a priority hypothesis of nausea.Then, they generate solutions to address Natasha’s nausea that will include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions; and they establish the expected outcome that after intervening, Natasha will report decreased nausea within thirty minutes.Nurse Sandy then takes action to implement these solutions.Nurse Sandy gathers supplies and re-enters Nastasha’s room.Nurse Sandy: Hi Natasha, I have a medication called ondansetron, to help with your nausea.
It goes underneath your tongue and dissolves.Natasha: Oh yeah, I remember. I had that in the emergency department, and it really helped.Nurse Sandy then administers the ondansetron according to the principles of safe medication administration.Nurse Sandy: Okay, it appears you have some fluids infusing through your IV, so you don’t get dehydrated.
I also have a cold compress for your forehead. Do you think that would feel good?Natasha: Yes, that would be nice.Nurse Sandy: Okay.
I placed the call bell right next to you. Don’t hesitate to call me if you need anything.Natasha: Thank you.Nurse Sandy assists Natasha to a comfortable position and leaves the room to document her interventions.Thirty minutes later, Nurse Sandy enters Natasha’s room to evaluate the outcome of her actions.
She takes Natasha’s vital signs and reassesses her pain. Her temperature is 98.6 F or 37.0 C, heart rate is 88 beats per minute, respirations are 16 breaths per minute, blood pressure is 112/68 mmHg, and oxygen saturation is 99 percent on room air.
Her pain rating is at 3 on a zero to 10 scale.Natasha is currently resting and tells Nurse Sandy that she no longer feels nauseated.
Nurse Sandy recognized and analyzed cues related to Natasha’s cholecystitis and, in collaboration with RN Mark, prioritized hypotheses and generated solutions to address her nausea.
Nurse Sandy and RN Mark then implemented pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures to address Natasha’s nausea and evaluated her outcomes by comparing them to the expected outcome.
Since Natasha’s nausea had improved, they determined that the plan
- "Adult health nursing. (9th ed.)." Elsevier ((2023))
- "Medical-surgical nursing. (8th ed.)." Elsevier ((2023))
- "Medical-surgical nursing: Concepts and practice" Elsevier ((2023))
No notes for this video yet
Try adding a note below