Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia 56

What It Is, Causes, Signs and Symptoms, and More

Author: Emily Miao, MD, PharmD
Editor: Alyssa Haag, MD
Editor: Józia McGowan, DO
Editor: Kelsey LaFayette, DNP, ARNP, FNP-C
Illustrator: Abbey Richard, MSc
Modified: Jan 06, 2025

What is hereditary spastic paraplegia 56?

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 56 is one of the many subtypes of hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP), which are a rare group of genetic neurologic disorders characterized by progressive degeneration of the corticospinal tracts (i.e., the major neuronal pathway responsible for voluntary motor function). HSP has an overall prevalence of approximately 1 to 10 per 100,000 individuals and results in gait impairment, bilateral lower extremity weakness, and spasticity (i.e., stiff, rigid muscle tone).  

HSP can be clinically classified as either “pure” or “complicated.” In its pure form, spasticity-related symptoms are localized to the bladder, exclusively. If other systemic (e.g., intellectual disability, dementia, skeletal dysmorphic features) or neurologic (e.g., peripheral neuropathy) symptoms are present, it is then classified as the complicated form.  

The “56” of “hereditary spastic paraplegia 56” is based upon the order of locus discovery (i.e., 56th genetic locus discovered), and to date, there are over 87 genetic loci that have been identified. Specifically, HSP 56 follows an autosomal recessive inheritance and is classified as “complicated” because it has been associated with peripheral neuropathy (i.e., damage to nerves outside of the brain and spinal cord), intellectual disability, extrapyramidal symptoms (e.g., continuous spasms or muscle contractions, restlessness, or tremors) in addition to lower extremity weakness and spasticity.  

An infographic detailing the background, causes, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of hereditary spastic paraplegia 56.

What causes hereditary spastic paraplegia 56?

Broadly, HSP is heterogeneous and can be autosomal recessive (i.e., requires two copies of the mutated gene to cause disease) or autosomal dominant (i.e., requires one copy of the mutated gene). More specifically, HSP 56 is due to an autosomal recessive gene mutation that encodes for cytochrome P450 2U1 protein (CYP2U1). Cytochrome P450s are a class of proteins that play a critical role in the metabolism of a variety of endogenous and exogenous compounds in the body. Specifically, CYP2U1 is responsible for fatty acid metabolism and neurologic function. 
 
All subtypes of HSP are hypothesized to be related to a variety of genetic mutations that affect the function of neurons, particularly the long axons (i.e., nerve fibers) that carry signals from the brain to the lower extremities via the corticospinal tract. While the molecular mechanisms of HSP have not been fully elucidated, whole exome sequencing studies (i.e., a sequencing technique that primarily focuses on sequencing the protein-coding regions of an individual’s genome) have identified and validated the function of several implicated genes in HSP. These studies suggest that genetic mutations in HSP disrupt intra- and intercellular trafficking, nucleotide metabolism, axonal transport, and development. 

What are the signs and symptoms of hereditary spastic paraplegia 56?

The reported signs and symptoms of HSP 56 include spastic gait with progressive stiffness and muscle weakness in the lower extremities bilaterally. Bladder dysfunction (e.g., urinary urgency) is a common, early presenting sign. Additional symptoms may include peripheral neuropathy , upper extremity spasms, intellectual disability, and extrapyramidal symptoms. 

How is hereditary spastic paraplegia 56 diagnosed?

The diagnosis of HSP 56 begins with a thorough review of characteristic symptoms and medical history. A neurologic exam may demonstrate bilateral leg weakness or spasticity, hyperreflexia, and positive Babinski reflex (i.e., stimulating the sole of the foot results in upward extension of the toes), which is an abnormal finding in adults suggestive of nervous system dysfunction. Molecular genetic testing confirms the diagnosis. For example, a multigene panel targeting known HSP-related genes is initially used to screen for pathogenic variants. Whole-genome sequencing is another option when multigene panel screening is equivocal. 

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the brain and spine may help exclude differential diagnoses including demyelinating and degenerative central nervous system lesions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, an autoimmune disease in which the body attacks its own nerves) and structural lesions (e.g., intracranial tumor). Laboratory blood tests can help exclude nutritional deficiency (e.g., vitamin B12 or copper deficiency) and cerebrospinal fluid studies can rule out chronic infections (e.g., HIV or neurosyphilis), which can present with similar symptoms. Nerve conduction studies can help exclude motor neuron disease (e.g.,  amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, [ALS] a progressive neurodegenerative disorder) since ALS can also present with muscle twitching and weakness.  

How is hereditary spastic paraplegia 56 treated?

Treatment of HSP 56 consists of supportive measures aimed at improving the individual’s mobility, spasticity, and discomfort, as there are no disease-modifying therapies currently available. There are a variety of pharmacologic options used to treat spasticity, such as muscle relaxants (e.g., baclofen, tizanidine) and intramuscular botulinum toxin. For bladder dysfunction, anticholinergic medications (e.g., oxybutynin) can be used. Referral to a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist and physical or occupational therapists can improve the individual’s mobility and strength. Finally, genetic counseling may be offered to individuals and their families so that they can learn about how this condition might affect future generations.  

What are the most important facts to know about hereditary spastic paraplegia 56?

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 56 is one of the many subtypes of hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP), a rare group of genetic neurologic disorders characterized by progressive degeneration of the corticospinal tracts. Whole exome sequencing studies suggest that genetic mutations in HSP disrupt intra- and intercellular trafficking, nucleotide metabolism, axonal transport, and development. HSP 56, in particular, is due to an autosomal recessive gene mutation that encodes for CYP2U1. Reported signs and symptoms of HSP 56 include spastic gait with progressive stiffness and muscle weakness in the lower extremities bilaterally, bladder dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, upper extremity spasms, intellectual disability, and extrapyramidal symptoms. Diagnosis begins with a thorough review of characteristic symptoms. Genetic testing confirms the diagnosis and is performed through multigene screening or whole-exome sequencing. Treatment consists of supportive measures aimed at improving an individual’s symptoms and functional status. Pharmacologic options include muscle relaxants (i.e., baclofen, tizanidine) and intramuscular botulinum toxin to relieve muscle stiffness and/or spasticity, and anticholinergic medications (i.e., oxybutynin) to improve urinary urge incontinence. Finally, referral to a physical medicine and rehabilitation service can help improve the individual’s functional status, mobility, and strength. 

References


Denora PS, Santorelli FM, Bertini E. Hereditary spastic paraplegias: one disease for many genes, and still counting. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1899-1912. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00060-5  


Fink JK. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinico-pathologic features and emerging molecular mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(3):307-328. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1115-8  


Novarino G, Fenstermaker AG, Zaki MS, et al. Exome sequencing links corticospinal motor neuron disease to common neurodegenerative disorders. Science. 2014;343(6170):506-511. doi:10.1126/science.1247363 


Tesson C, Nawara M, Salih MA, et al. Alteration of fatty-acid-metabolizing enzymes affects mitochondrial form and function in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(6):1051-1064. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.001