Case study - Burn (pediatric): Nursing
Introduction0:00–0:37
Recognizing and Analyzing Cues0:37–2:46
First, nurse Lawrence recognizes important cues including abigail's vital signs which are temperature 98.6 °F or 37 °C, heart rate, 88 BPM respirations, 18 breaths per minute BP, 96/52 millimeters of mercury and oxygen saturation 100% on room air.
Next, nurse Lawrence uses the face legs, activity, cry and consolability or flax scale and determines abigail's pain rating is five out of 10 according to her behavioral cues.
They also see that she's been prescribed medication for pain management and that she received her last dose four hours ago.
This destroys the network of immune cells that reside in the epidermis and the physical barrier. The skin provides against microorganisms.
He further understands that the risk of infection is increased because the wound exudate is easily colonized by bacteria and the vascular supply to the burned tissue is impaired.
Nurse, Lawrence realizes that Abigail needs management of her burn injuries to promote skin integrity and prevent infection.
Now, using the information they've gathered. Nurse Lawrence and RN Miley choose a priority hypothesis of impaired skin integrity.
Prioritizing Hypotheses, Generating Solutions, and Taking Action2:46–4:53
Then together they generate solutions to address abigail's impaired skin integrity that will include pharmacologic and non pharmacologic interventions and they established the expected outcome that after intervening abigail's burns will show no signs of infection at the end of the shift.
Nurse Lawrence then takes action to implement these solutions. He knows it's been four hours since Abigail's last dose of pain medication and her dressings will need to be changed soon.
He also knows that providing pain medication prior to dressing changes makes it easier to tolerate the procedure. So he prepares the dose of the pain medication and re enter Abigail's room.
Then he proceeds to administer the pain medication using safe medication administration principles. One hour later, nurse Lawrence and RN Miley return to Abigail's room.
RN Miley assesses Abigail's pain level to be one out of 10 according to the FLAX scale. And nurse Lawrence puts on Abigail's favorite music to provide distraction before they remove the soil dressings together.
They look closely at each wound and not partial and full thickness burns distributed in a splatter pattern on Abigail's right shoulder, arm, torso and thigh that are in various stages of healing.
Lastly, nurse Lawrence sits with abigail and helps her to choose high protein, food and snacks from the menu to promote wound healing.
At the end of the shift. Nurse Lawrence evaluates the outcomes of his actions.
Evaluating Outcomes4:53–5:25
He takes Abigail's vital signs which are temperature 98.6 °F or 37 °C, heart rate, 90 BPM, respiratory rate, 20 breaths per minute BP, 94/50 millimeters of mercury and pain level is a zero out of 10 using the Flax scale.
He checks abigail's dressings and notes that no increased drainage or foul odor are present. All right.
Review5:25–6:00
As a quick recap, nurse Lawrence recognized and analyzed cues related to abigail's impaired skin integrity and in collaboration with RN Miley prioritized hypotheses and generated solutions to address this problem.
Nurse Lawrence and RN Miley then implemented pharmacologic and non pharmacologic measures and evaluated abigail's outcomes and compared them to the expected outcome.
Since abigail's burns showed no signs of infection. At the end of the shift, they determined the plan of care was successful.
- "Introduction to maternity and pediatric nursing. (9th ed.)" Elsevier (2023)
- "Burn injury: Nursing" Osmosis (2023, 5/25)
No notes for this video yet
Try adding a note below