Two-way ANOVA

Last updated: June 19, 2025

Two-way ANOVA

Watch later

Watch later

Diabetes mellitus: Pathology review
Osmoregulation
Cranial nerves
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
Light microscopy and staining methods
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
Tobacco use disorder
Introduction to biostatistics
Types of data
Probability
Mean, median, and mode
Range, variance, and standard deviation
Standard error of the mean (Central limit theorem)
Normal distribution and z-scores
Paired t-test
Two-sample t-test
Hypothesis testing: One-tailed and two-tailed tests
One-way ANOVA
Two-way ANOVA
Repeated measures ANOVA
Correlation
Methods of regression analysis
Linear regression
Logistic regression
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient
Mann-Whitney U test
Kappa coefficient
Chi-squared test
Fisher's exact test
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
Type I and type II errors
Cardiovascular system anatomy and physiology
Coronary circulation
Blood pressure, blood flow, and resistance
Pressures in the cardiovascular system
Measuring cardiac output (Fick principle)
Stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output
Cardiac contractility
Cardiac preload
Cardiac afterload
Law of Laplace
Cardiac and vascular function curves
Altering cardiac and vascular function curves
Cardiac cycle
Cardiac work
Pressure-volume loops
Changes in pressure-volume loops
Frank-Starling relationship
Microcirculation and Starling forces
Abnormal heart sounds
Normal heart sounds
HIV (AIDS)
Integrase and entry inhibitors
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)
Protease inhibitors
Hepatitis medications
Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)
Neuraminidase inhibitors
Herpesvirus medications
Diarrhea: Clinical
Celiac disease
Ketone body metabolism
Pediatric allergies: Clinical
Phenylketonuria (NORD)
Antituberculosis medications
Diabetes mellitus
Insulins
Hypertension
Hypertension: Clinical
Type III hypersensitivity
Type IV hypersensitivity
Type I hypersensitivity
Type II hypersensitivity
Poliovirus
Gastrointestinal hormones
Cell cycle
Osteoarthritis
Pediatric brain tumors
Adult brain tumors
Pediatric bone tumors: Clinical
Bone tumors: Pathology review
Inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical
Cholinergic receptors
Adrenergic receptors
Cholinomimetics: Direct agonists
Cholinomimetics: Indirect agonists (anticholinesterases)
Muscarinic antagonists
Sympathomimetics: Direct agonists
Sympatholytics: Alpha-2 agonists
Adrenergic antagonists: Presynaptic
Adrenergic antagonists: Alpha blockers
Adrenergic antagonists: Beta blockers
Sexually transmitted infections: Clinical
Cell wall synthesis inhibitors: Penicillins
Lung volumes and capacities
Gas exchange in the lungs, blood and tissues
Clostridium botulinum (Botulism)
Dyslipidemias: Pathology review
Lactose intolerance
Glucagon
Cystic fibrosis: Pathology review
MHC class I and MHC class II molecules
Fetal circulation
Hypokalemia: Clinical
Hyperkalemia: Clinical
Anatomy and physiology of the male reproductive system
Anatomy of the male reproductive organs of the pelvis
Anatomy and physiology of the female reproductive system
Anatomy of the female urogenital triangle
Vaginal and vulvar disorders: Pathology review
Iron deficiency anemia
Appendicitis: Clinical
Hyperthyroidism: Pathology review
Hunger and satiety
Thyroid cancer
Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)
Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 (NORD)
Multiple endocrine neoplasia
Multiple endocrine neoplasia: Pathology review
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors
Tricyclic antidepressants
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
Atypical antidepressants
Typical antipsychotics
Atypical antipsychotics
Lithium
Nonbenzodiazepine anticonvulsants
Anticonvulsants and anxiolytics: Barbiturates
Anticonvulsants and anxiolytics: Benzodiazepines
Psychomotor stimulants
Anticoagulants: Heparin
Anticoagulants: Warfarin
Anticoagulants: Direct factor inhibitors
Antiplatelet medications
Thrombolytics
Nervous system anatomy and physiology
Blood brain barrier
Ascending and descending spinal tracts
Pyramidal and extrapyramidal tracts
Dementia: Pathology review
Muscular dystrophies and mitochondrial myopathies: Pathology review
Hidradenitis suppurativa
Viral hepatitis: Clinical
Cauda equina syndrome
Cervical cancer
Skin cancer
Gastric cancer
Lung cancer
Colorectal cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Skin cancer: Clinical
Breast cancer: Clinical
Cytokines
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Amino acid metabolism
Citric acid cycle
DNA mutations
Rotator cuff tear
Compartment syndrome
Anatomy of the knee joint
Acute intermittent porphyria
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
Primary biliary cholangitis
Drug misuse, intoxication and withdrawal: Alcohol: Pathology review
Substance misuse and addiction: Clinical
Gene regulation
General anesthetics
Retinopathy of prematurity
Erythema multiforme
Papulosquamous skin disorders: Clinical
Psoriasis
DNA damage and repair
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Glycogen storage disorders: Pathology review
Coronary steal syndrome
Anatomy of the coronary circulation
Coronary artery disease: Clinical
ECG cardiac infarction and ischemia
Local anesthetics
Chest trauma: Clinical
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Pediatric vomiting: Clinical
Pediatric ophthalmological conditions: Clinical
BRUE, ALTE, and SIDS: Clinical
Pediatric orthopedic conditions: Clinical
Congenital heart defects: Clinical
Neonatal jaundice: Clinical
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Clinical
Thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer: Clinical
Hypothyroidism and thyroiditis: Clinical
Ectoderm
Endoderm
Mesoderm
Breast cancer
Amyloidosis
Coronary artery disease: Pathology review
Introduction to the immune system
Contracting the immune response and peripheral tolerance
Innate immune system
Viral structure and functions
Bone histology
Bone remodeling and repair
Vessels and nerves of the hand
Jaundice: Clinical
Neonatal ICU conditions: Clinical
Jaundice: Pathology review
Stroke: Clinical
Transcription of DNA
Lac operon
Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes
Epigenetics
Dizziness and vertigo: Clinical
ECG axis
ECG basics
ECG intervals
ECG QRS transition
ECG normal sinus rhythm
ECG rate and rhythm
ECG cardiac hypertrophy and enlargement
Carcinoid syndrome
Cushing syndrome and Cushing disease: Pathology review
Lung cancer and mesothelioma: Pathology review
Lung cancer: Clinical
Imaging features of COVID-19 (LifeBridge Health)
Development of the COVID-19 vaccine
Standards of care for COVID-19 patients
Safety of the COVID-19 vaccines
COVID-19 mutant variants and herd immunity
COVID-19 vaccines: What healthcare providers need to know
Mitosis and meiosis
Amino acids and protein folding
Neurofibromatosis
Drug administration and dosing regimens
Neuron action potential
Gestational trophoblastic disease: Clinical
Physiological changes during exercise
Nitrogen and urea cycle
Fatty acid synthesis
Electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation
Cellular structure and function
Carbohydrates and sugars
Glycolysis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Ischemic stroke
Anatomy of the heart
Headaches: Pathology review
Herpes simplex virus
Neurocutaneous disorders: Pathology review
Temporomandibular joint dysfunction
Pituitary tumors: Pathology review
Anatomy of the blood supply to the brain
Anatomy of the brainstem
Immunodeficiencies: T-cell and B-cell disorders: Pathology review

Transcript

Watch video only

Content Reviewers

Contributors

Analysis of variance, or simply, ANOVA, is a type of parametric statistical test used to determine if there’s a significant difference between the means or averages of three or more groups.

And significance is normally defined by a p-value of less than 0.05 or 5%.

Now when doing any parametric test, there are three key assumptions that we have to make about the population.

First, the sample population must have been recruited randomly. Choosing names randomly ensures that the people included in the study will have similar characteristics to the target population. This is important because that ensures that the results of the t-test can be applied to the target population - meaning it has good external validity!

The second assumption is that each individual in the sample was recruited independently from other individuals in the sample. In other words, no individuals influenced whether or not any other individual was included in the study.

For example, if two friends decided to get their blood pressures measured on the same day, and they were both included in the study, these two individuals would not be independent of each other and the second assumption would not be met.

Like random sampling, independent recruitment of individuals is important because it ensures that the sample population approximates the target population.

The third assumption is that the sample size is large enough to approximate the target population, which usually means having more than 20 people.

If it’s impossible to get a large sample size, then the sample population must follow a normal bell-shaped distribution for the characteristic being studied because that’s what we would expect to see in the target population.

Okay, now let’s say there are three medications available for lowering systolic blood pressure, and you want to figure out if any of the medications work differently than the others. Additionally, you want to figure out if the medications work differently for males and females.

So, let’s say that you find 6 people - 3 males and 3 females - who take Medication A for 6 weeks, and that afterwards the mean systolic blood pressure is 130 mmHg for males and 125 mmHg for females. Then, you find another 3 males and 3 females who have been taking Medication B - and afterwards their mean systolic blood pressure is 138 for males and 126 for females, and finally you find 3 males and 3 females who have been taking Medication C - and afterwards their systolic blood pressure is 132 for males and 125 for females.

We can arrange the numbers in a table like this, with sex on the top and medication type on the side, and each cell represents a mean systolic blood pressure value.

To figure out if medication type and sex have an effect on systolic blood pressure, we can use an ANOVA test.

Specifically, we would use a two-way ANOVA test, because we are testing two factors - medication type and sex - that each have multiple groups within them.

There are three groups in the medication factor - which are A, B, and C - and we’ll use two groups for sex - male and female.

A two-way ANOVA test has six hypotheses. The first three are null hypotheses.

The first null hypothesis says that there’s no difference in systolic blood pressure for people taking different medication types.

The second null hypothesis says that there is no difference in systolic blood pressure for males and females.

The third null hypothesis says that there is no interaction between medication type and sex.

Interaction means that one factor influences the relationship between the second factor and the outcome. So, in this example, interaction would mean that the effect of medication on systolic blood pressure is different for males and females.

The alternate hypotheses are the opposite of the null hypotheses.

The first one says that there is a difference in systolic blood pressure for people taking different medication types; the second one says that there is a difference in systolic blood pressure for males and females; and the third one says that there is an interaction between medication type and sex.

Now, there are seven steps to test these hypotheses.

The first step is to calculate the mean of each factor, so the mean for all the medication types and the mean for both sexes.

To find the overall row mean systolic blood pressure for the medication A group, we add up the mean blood pressures for both males and females in that group, and divide by 2. So, 130 plus 125, divided by 2, is 127.5. We can do the same thing for the medication B and C groups. So, 138 plus 126, divided by 2, is 132. And 132 plus 125, divided by 2, is 128.5.

Finally, we can find the grand mean - which is the mean blood pressure measurements for all the medication groups - by adding up each row mean and dividing by 3. So 127.5 plus 132 plus 128.5, divided by 3, gives us a grand mean of 129.

To find the overall column means for the second factor, we add up the mean blood pressures in each medication group and divide by 3. So for males, 130 plus 138 plus 132, divided by 3, is 133.3. And for females, 125 plus 126 plus 125, divided by 3, equals 125.3. Notice that if we add up the column means for both sexes and divide by 2, it equals 129, which is the grand mean.

The second step is to find the total sum of squares, which tells you how much variation there is in the dependent variables. In other words, it compares every single individual in the study to the grand mean.

If the total sum of squares is large, it means that the individuals in the study, at every time point, are very spread out from one another; and if the total sum of squares is small, it means that the individuals in the study, at every time point, are clustered together.

To get the sum of squares, we start by subtracting the grand mean from each individual’s systolic blood pressure measurement, and then squaring it, which is called the squared difference. Then, we add up all the squared differences to get the total sum of squares. There are 18 people in this study, so we will have 18 squared differences, but to save time, let’s just do the first three.

The first person in the study is a female who took Medication A, and her systolic blood pressure is 124. So, we subtract the grand mean, which is 129, from 124, which equals negative 5. Then we square it, so 5-squared is 25. The second person is also a female who took Medication A, and her blood pressure is 126. So, 126 minus 129 is negative 3, squared, is 9. For the third person, who is also a female that took Medication A, we do 125 minus 129, which is negative 4, and then square it, which is 16. So, if we add up all of the squared differences for everyone in the study, we get a total sum of squares of 743.

The third step is to find the between-group variation, which is also called the sum of squares-between, or the SSB.

The sum of squares-between is a measure of how similar each group’s mean is to the grand mean. And, since we have two factors, we have to find the sum of squares-between for each factor and them add them together to get the total sum of squares-between.

To get the sum of squares-between for the medication factor, we start by subtracting the grand mean from each group’s row mean and squaring it, to get the squared difference. Then, we multiply the squared difference by the number of people in that group.

So, let’s start with the medication factor. For medication 1, the row mean is 127.5. So, the squared difference is 127.5 minus 129, squared, which is 2.25. Then, since there are 6 people in the medication group, we multiply 2.25 by 6, which equals 13.5. We do that same thing for the other two medication groups - so, 132 minus 129, squared, times 6, is 54; and 128.5 minus 129, squared, times 6, is 1.5. When we add up all the squared differences for all the medications, we get 13.5 plus 54 plus 1.5, which equals 69.

We do a similar process to get the sum of squares-between for the sex factor, but this time we use the column means.

For males, we subtract the grand mean from the column mean, then square it. So, 133.3 minus 129 is 4.3, and 4.3-squared is 18.5. Then we multiply it by the number of males in the study, which is 9, so 18.5 times 9 is 166.5. For females, the equation is the same, but we substitute in their column mean, which is 125.3. So 125.3 minus 129, squared, times 9, is 123. And when we add up both the sum of squares-between for males and females we get 289.5.

The fourth step in the ANOVA calculation is to find the within-group variation, which is also called the sum of squares-within, or SSW.

The sum of squares-within is a measure of how similar each individual blood pressure measurement is from its own group mean.

The sum of squares-within is sometimes called the sum of squared-error, because it’s the variation in systolic blood pressure that can’t be explained by either the different medication or the different sex, so it’s sort of this unexplained error in the blood pressure measurement. Basically, it’s the variation caused by individual characteristics, like age or genetic differences.

To find the sum of squares-within, we divide the individual blood pressure measurements into two tables - one for males and one for females. Now, let’s work with the male table first. For the sum of squares-within, you start by finding the squared differences for each person in one group, and to do this, you take each individual blood pressure measurement and subtract that group’s mean - which is the row mean - and then square it. For example, let’s just take the first 3 systolic blood pressure, which are the measurements in the Medication A group. So, it’s 122, 136, and 133. Since the row mean for Medication A is 130, you subtract 130 from each individual measurement, so 122 minus 130 is negative 8, 136 minus 130 is 6, and 133 minus 130 is 3. Then you square each number and add them all together to get the squared difference. So, when you add up negative 8-squared, or 64, and 6-squared, or 36, and 3-squared, or 9, you get 109.

Key Takeaways

Two-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) is a statistical method used to determine whether there are significant differences between two or more groups of data. It involves testing for two or more factors, or variables, that may influence the outcome of an experiment or study.

Two-way ANOVA allows for the examination of the main effects of each factor, as well as any interaction between the factors. The method calculates an F-value, which is then compared to a critical value to determine statistical significance. Two-way ANOVA is commonly used in various research fields, including medicine, psychology, and social sciences, to analyze data and test hypotheses.