Video Case Study - Caring for Pediatric Patients With Burn Injuries
Introduction0:00–0:37
In collaboration with the registered nurse, RN Miley, Nurse Lawrence goes through the steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model to make clinical decisions about Abigail’s care by recognizing and analyzing cues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes.
First, Nurse Lawrence recognizes important cues, including Abigail’s vital signs, which are temperature 98.6 F or 37 C, heart rate 88 beats per minute, respirations 18 breaths per minute, blood pressure 96/52 mmHg, and oxygen saturation 100 percent on room air.
Recognizing and Analyzing Cues0:37–2:46
Next, Nurse Lawrence uses the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability, or FLACC scale, and determines Abigail’s pain rating is 5 out of 10 according to her behavioral cues.
They also see that she’s been prescribed medication for pain management and that she received her last dose four hours ago.
This destroys the network of immune cells that reside in the epidermis and the physical barrier the skin provides against microorganisms.
He further understands that the risk of infection is increased because the wound exudate is easily colonized by bacteria and the vascular supply to the burned tissue is impaired.
Nurse Lawrence realizes that Abigail needs management of her burn injuries to promote skin integrity and prevent infection.
Now, using the information they've gathered, Nurse Lawrence and RN Miley choose a priority hypothesis of impaired skin integrity.
Prioritizing Hypotheses, Generating Solutions, and Taking Action2:46–4:53
Then, together they generate solutions to address Abigail’s impaired skin integrity that will include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions; and they establish the expected outcome that after intervening, Abigail’s burns will show no signs of infection at the end of the shift.
Nurse Lawrence then takes action to implement these solutions. He knows it’s been four hours since Abigail’s last dose of pain medication and her dressings will need to be changed soon.
He also knows that providing pain medication prior to dressing changes makes it easier to tolerate the procedure, so he prepares the dose of the pain medication and re-enters Abigail’s room.
Then, he proceeds to administer the pain medication using safe medication administration principles. One hour later, Nurse Lawrence and RN Miley return to Abigail’s room.
RN Miley assesses Abigail’s pain level to be 1 out of 10 according to the FLACC scale; and Nurse Lawrence puts on Abigail’s favorite music to provide distraction before they remove the soiled dressings.
Together, they look closely at each wound and note partial- and full-thickness burns distributed in a spatter pattern on Abigail’s right shoulder, arm, torso and thigh (IMG 5-6) that are in various stages of healing.
Lastly, Nurse Lawrence sits with Abigail and helps her to choose high-protein food and snacks from the menu to promote wound healing.
At the end of the shift, Nurse Lawrence evaluates the outcomes of his actions. He takes Abigail’s vital signs, which are temperature 98.6 F or 37 C, heart rate 90 beats per minute, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, blood pressure 94/50 mmHg, and pain level is a 0 out of 10 using the FLACC scale.
Evaluating Outcomes4:53–5:26
He checks Abigail’s dressings and notes that no increased drainage or foul odor are present. Alright, as a quick recap… Nurse Lawrence recognized and analyzed cues related to Abigail’s impaired skin integrity, and in collaboration with RN Miley, prioritized hypotheses and generated solutions to address this problem.
Review5:26–6:00
Nurse Lawrence and RN Miley then implemented pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures and evaluated Abigail's outcomes and compared them to the expected outcome.
Since Abigail’s burns showed no signs of infection at the end of the shift, they determined the plan of care was successful.
- "Introduction to maternity and pediatric nursing, 9th ed." Elsevier (2023)
- "Burn injury: Nursing" Osmosis from Elsevier (2023)
No notes for this video yet
Try adding a note below