Approach to aphasia: Clinical sciences

Last updated: January 30, 2025

Approach to aphasia: Clinical sciences

Watch later

Watch later

Approach to hypertension: Clinical sciences
Chest X-ray interpretation: Clinical sciences
Acute mesenteric ischemia: Clinical sciences
Aortic dissection: Clinical sciences
Cardiac tamponade: Clinical sciences
Congestive heart failure: Clinical sciences
Hypovolemic shock: Clinical sciences
Infectious endocarditis: Clinical sciences
Mitral stenosis: Clinical sciences
Pericarditis: Clinical sciences
Peripheral arterial disease and ulcers: Clinical sciences
Right heart failure: Clinical sciences
Temporal arteritis: Clinical sciences
Valvular insufficiency (regurgitation): Clinical sciences
Approach to hyperthyroidism and thyrotoxicosis: Clinical sciences
Approach to hypothyroidism: Clinical sciences
Approach to hypoglycemia: Clinical sciences
Acute pancreatitis: Clinical sciences
Cushing syndrome and Cushing disease: Clinical sciences
Adrenal insufficiency: Clinical sciences
Diabetes mellitus (Type 1): Clinical sciences
Diabetes mellitus (Type 2): Clinical sciences
Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state: Clinical sciences
Graves disease: Clinical Sciences
Diabetic ketoacidosis: Clinical sciences
Hashimoto thyroiditis: Clinical sciences
Hyperparathyroidism: Clinical sciences
Primary aldosteronism (hyperaldosteronism): Clinical sciences
Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion: Clinical sciences
Approach to periumbilical and lower abdominal pain: Clinical sciences
Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) toxicity: Clinical sciences
Appendicitis: Clinical sciences
Cholecystitis: Clinical sciences
Choledocholithiasis and cholangitis: Clinical sciences
Diverticulitis: Clinical sciences
Hepatic encephalopathy: Clinical sciences
Hepatitis A and E: Clinical sciences
Hepatitis B: Clinical sciences
Hepatitis C: Clinical sciences
Ileus: Clinical sciences
Irritable bowel syndrome: Clinical sciences
Large bowel obstruction: Clinical sciences
Peptic ulcer disease: Clinical sciences
Small bowel obstruction: Clinical sciences
Approach to bleeding disorders (coagulopathy): Clinical sciences
Approach to bleeding disorders (thrombocytopenia): Clinical sciences
Approach to bleeding disorders (platelet dysfunction): Clinical sciences
Approach to hypercoagulable disorders: Clinical sciences
Approach to leukemia: Clinical sciences
Iron deficiency anemia: Clinical sciences
Sickle cell disease: Clinical sciences
Vitamin B12 deficiency: Clinical sciences
Basal cell carcinoma: Clinical sciences
Burns: Clinical sciences
Lyme disease: Clinical sciences
Melanoma: Clinical sciences
Necrotizing soft tissue infections: Clinical sciences
Pressure-induced skin and soft tissue injury: Clinical sciences
Approach to lymphoma: Clinical sciences
Approach to hallucinogen, inhalant, and cannabis use, intoxication, and overdose: Clinical sciences
Approach to stimulant use, intoxication, and overdose: Clinical sciences
Approach to trauma and stressor-related disorders: Clinical sciences
Opioid intoxication and overdose: Clinical sciences
Bipolar I, bipolar II, and cyclothymic disorder: Clinical sciences
Opioid use disorder: Clinical sciences
Substance use disorder: Clinical sciences
Approach to a fever in the returned traveler: Clinical sciences
Approach to a postoperative fever: Clinical sciences
Approach to acid-base disorders: Clinical sciences
Approach to a fever: Clinical sciences
Approach to hypercalcemia: Clinical sciences
Approach to hyperkalemia: Clinical sciences
Approach to hyponatremia: Clinical sciences
Approach to metabolic alkalosis: Clinical sciences
Approach to nosocomial infections: Clinical sciences
Approach to metabolic acidosis: Clinical sciences
Approach to hypernatremia: Clinical sciences
Approach to respiratory acidosis: Clinical sciences
Approach to respiratory alkalosis: Clinical sciences
Infectious mononucleosis: Clinical sciences
Obesity and metabolic syndrome: Clinical sciences
Systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical sciences
Tuberculosis (extrapulmonary and latent): Clinical sciences
Approach to unsteadiness, gait disturbance, or falls: Clinical sciences
Myasthenia gravis: Clinical sciences
Osteoarthritis: Clinical sciences
Septic arthritis: Clinical sciences
Spinal fractures: Clinical sciences
Rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical sciences
Spinal infection and abscess: Clinical sciences
Approach to aphasia: Clinical sciences
Approach to blunt traumatic cervical spine injuries: Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (brainstem): Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (cerebral cortical and subcortical structures): Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (cerebellum): Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (motor neuron): Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (nerve root, plexus, and peripheral nerve): Clinical sciences
Approach to differentiating lesions (spinal cord): Clinical sciences
Approach to dysarthria or dysphagia: Clinical sciences
Approach to headache or facial pain: Clinical sciences
Approach to epilepsy: Clinical sciences
Approach to increased intracranial pressure: Clinical sciences
Approach to traumatic brain injury: Clinical sciences
Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or TIA: Clinical sciences
Delirium: Clinical sciences
Brain death: Clinical sciences
Diabetes insipidus: Clinical sciences
Guillain-Barré syndrome: Clinical sciences
Meningitis and brain abscess: Clinical sciences
Subarachnoid hemorrhage: Clinical sciences
Approach to lower limb edema: Clinical sciences
Approach to vasculitis: Clinical sciences
Deep vein thrombosis: Clinical sciences
Venous insufficiency and ulcers: Clinical sciences
Sexually transmitted infection screening (GYN): Clinical sciences
Approach to vaginal discharge: Clinical sciences
Chlamydia trachomatis infection: Clinical sciences
Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: Clinical sciences
Pelvic inflammatory disease: Clinical sciences
Approach to dyspnea: Clinical sciences
Approach to pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis (perforated viscus): Clinical sciences
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: Clinical sciences
Asthma in pregnancy: Clinical sciences
Airway obstruction: Clinical sciences
Atelectasis: Clinical sciences
Asthma: Clinical sciences
Community-acquired pneumonia: Clinical sciences
Empyema: Clinical sciences
Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Clinical sciences
Influenza: Clinical sciences
Pleural effusion: Clinical sciences
Pulmonary embolism: Clinical sciences
Pneumothorax: Clinical sciences
Upper respiratory tract infections: Clinical sciences
Tuberculosis (pulmonary): Clinical sciences
Approach to acute kidney injury: Clinical sciences
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection: Clinical sciences
Intrinsic acute kidney injury (glomerular causes): Clinical sciences
Chronic kidney disease: Clinical sciences
Intrinsic acute kidney injury (non-glomerular causes): Clinical sciences
Lower urinary tract infection: Clinical sciences
Postrenal acute kidney injury: Clinical sciences
Pyelonephritis: Clinical sciences
Prerenal acute kidney injury: Clinical sciences
Asthma: Information for patients and families (The Primary School)
Food allergies and EpiPens: Information for patients and families (The Primary School)
Empathetic listening for clinicians
Shared decision-making
Implicit bias
The do's and don'ts of patient care
Cardiovascular disease screening: Clinical sciences
Essential hypertension: Clinical sciences
Approach to a murmur (pediatrics): Clinical sciences
Carotid artery stenosis screening: Clinical sciences
Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: Clinical sciences
Randomized control trial
Clinical trials
Study designs
Bias in performing clinical studies
Problem-based learning
Sample size
Information bias
Selection bias
Case-control study
Cohort study
Hypothesis testing: One-tailed and two-tailed tests
Correlation
Paired t-test
Types of data
Bias in interpreting results of clinical studies
Two-sample t-test
The role of the kidney in acid-base balance
Anatomy of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN IX)
Anticoagulants: Warfarin
Class I antiarrhythmics: Sodium channel blockers
Hepatitis A and Hepatitis E virus
Class IV antiarrhythmics: Calcium channel blockers and others
Anatomy clinical correlates: Oculomotor (CN III), trochlear (CN IV) and abducens (CN VI) nerves
Anatomy of the facial nerve (CN VII)
Anatomy of the vestibulocochlear nerve (CN VIII)
Anatomy clinical correlates: Glossopharyngeal (CN IX), vagus (X), spinal accessory (CN XI) and hypoglossal (CN XII) nerves
Anatomy clinical correlates: Facial (CN VII) and vestibulocochlear (CN VIII) nerves
Anatomy of the trigeminal nerve (CN V)
Anatomy of the spinal accessory (CN XI) and hypoglossal (CN XII) nerves
Anatomy of the vagus nerve (CN X)
Definitions of acids and bases
Anatomy clinical correlates: Trigeminal nerve (CN V)
Kidney stones: Pathology review
Meningitis
Cellulitis and erysipelas: Clinical sciences
Sepsis: Clinical sciences
Bacterial vaginosis: Clinical sciences
Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis: Clinical sciences
Clostridioides difficile infection: Clinical sciences

Decision-Making Tree

Transcript

Watch video only

Aphasia refers to an acquired communication disorder that can affect the patient’s ability to speak, understand speech, read, and write. Lesions anywhere along the language circuitry can result in this communication impairment. Now, based on the part of the brain that's affected, we can further subdivide aphasia into several main types! Broca and transcortical motor aphasia are characterized by impairment in language production or expression, while Wernicke and transcortical sensory aphasia are associated with a loss of language comprehension or reception. Finally, conduction aphasia is characterized by a loss of repetition, and global aphasia is associated with a severe loss of language production and comprehension.

Now, if your patient presents with a chief concern suggestive of aphasia, first, obtain a focused history and physical exam. Friends and family members will typically report that the patient has trouble communicating. Additionally, the physical exam will usually reveal limited verbal or written language output, nonsensical speech, impaired comprehension of verbal or written language, or impaired repetition. With any of these findings, you can diagnose aphasia, so your next step is to assess the type.

First, let’s focus on expressive aphasia! These patients are speaking in short, poorly-formed sentences. Also, they will have difficulties coming up with words and they will have trouble with writing. The physical exam is notable for non-fluent speech, meaning speech that is not smooth, with word-finding difficulty, loss of grammar, and abnormal rate and cadence. The patient is sometimes described as having telegraphic speech, with improper grammar and using mainly nouns and verbs. Something similar to the early days when telegrams were a mode of long-distance communication, and the sender was charged by the word. You will also find impaired written language with mostly intact reading and hearing comprehension. In this case, diagnose an expressive aphasia. Of note, patients with expressive aphasia are usually aware of their language impairment, so they will appear very frustrated during attempts to communicate.

Now, there are two main types of expressive aphasia. In order to differentiate between the two, you will need to assess the patient’s ability to repeat words or phrases. If your patient is unable to repeat, the brain injury is in the Broca area, which is in the dominant posterior inferior frontal lobe. In this case, diagnose Broca aphasia. On the other hand, if repetition is intact, the lesion is anterior and superior to the Broca area in the dominant frontal lobe, so be sure to diagnose transcortical motor aphasia.

Next, let’s take a look at receptive aphasia! These patients are speaking effortlessly but what they are saying makes no sense. Also, they will have trouble understanding others and reading. The physical exam will show that speech is fluent but nonsensical, meaning that the patient may speak at a relatively normal rate and cadence, but the content doesn’t make sense. This is often described as a word salad. They might use a word that sounds similar or is similar in meaning, to the word they’re trying to say. These errors are known as paraphasic errors. Also, you will notice that the comprehension of written and spoken language is significantly impaired. In this case, diagnose receptive aphasia. In contrast to expressive aphasia, individuals with receptive aphasia often do not have insight into their loss of language, so they are often frustrated that people can’t understand their speech.

Once you diagnose receptive aphasia, again, assess the patient’s ability to repeat words or phrases. If the patient can't repeat what you are saying, the lesion is in the dominant posterior superior temporal lobe, at the Wernicke area, where language comprehension is processed. In this case, diagnose Wernicke aphasia. On the flip side, if your patient can repeat, the lesion is not in the Wernicke area, but close to it, so diagnose transcortical sensory aphasia.

Now, let’s move on to conduction aphasia. Conduction aphasia is associated with lesions of the arcuate fasciculus, which is a pathway that connects Wernicke and Broca areas. These individuals usually make minor errors in otherwise pretty normal speech. Also, they will have some mild trouble with understanding others and with reading. Finally, the physical exam will show mostly fluent speech and mildly impaired comprehension, but with severe inability to repeat words and phrases. With these findings, diagnose conduction aphasia!

Finally, let’s discuss global aphasia, which is the most severe type of aphasia that’s usually associated with a large lesion affecting both the Broca and Wernicke areas and the region between them. In this case, close friends and family members will report that the patient is not speaking or that they have minimal speech. Also, they will report that the patient doesn’t understand any spoken language. The exam will reveal no speech output or minimal nonfluent speech output. Additionally, the patient will be unable to write, comprehend spoken and written language, and repeat any phrases. With these findings, diagnose global aphasia!

Now, once you diagnose a specific type of aphasia, it’s time to figure out the underlying cause. Start by assessing the timing of symptom onset. If the aphasia appears suddenly, you should consider stroke or traumatic brain injury. In both cases, the injury involves more than just language areas, so the patient will present with additional focal neurologic deficits, such as contralateral weakness and visual field loss. Next, obtain a CT or MRI of the brain. If imaging reveals infarction or hemorrhage, diagnose stroke as the underlying etiology.

Sources

  1. " Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. " Neurology (2011;76(11):1006-1014. )
  2. "Chapter 13: Aphasia and aphasic syndromes. In: Jankovic J, Mazziotta JC, Pomeroy SL, Newman NJ, eds. Bradley and Daroff’s Neurology in Clinical Practice. 8th ed." Elsevier Inc; (2022)
  3. "Language and aphasias. " Continuum (Minneap Minn). (2021;27(6):1549-1561. )
  4. "Chapter 22: Disorders of speech and language. In: Ropper AH, Samuels MA, Klein JP, Prasad S, eds. Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology. 12th ed. " McGraw-Hill Education (2023.)