Cellulitis and erysipelas: Clinical sciences

Last updated: January 30, 2025

Cellulitis and erysipelas: Clinical sciences

ISU PA Program Prep for PACKRAT Exam

ISU PA Program Prep for PACKRAT Exam

Non-urothelial bladder cancers
Pyelonephritis: Clinical sciences
Renal failure: Pathology review
Transitional cell carcinoma
Physical and sexual abuse
Bulimia nervosa
Opioid intoxication and overdose: Clinical sciences
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Tobacco use disorder
Tobacco use: Clinical sciences
Psoriatic arthritis: Clinical sciences
Rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical sciences
Anatomy clinical correlates: Hip, gluteal region and thigh
Back pain: Pathology review
Developmental dysplasia of the hip: Clinical sciences
Gout: Clinical sciences
Osteomyelitis: Clinical sciences
Osteoporosis: Clinical sciences
Sciatica
Septic arthritis: Clinical sciences
Bordetella pertussis (Whooping cough)
Cellulitis and erysipelas: Clinical sciences
Herpes zoster infection (shingles): Clinical sciences
HIV (AIDS)
Infectious gastroenteritis: Clinical sciences
Lyme disease: Clinical sciences
Salmonella (non-typhoidal)
Salmonella typhi (typhoid fever)
Acute leukemia
Approach to anemia (destruction and sequestration): Clinical sciences
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia
Hemochromatosis: Clinical sciences
Pernicious anemia: Year of the Zebra
Sickle cell disease: Clinical sciences
Vitamin B12 deficiency: Clinical sciences
Celiac disease
Choledocholithiasis and cholangitis: Clinical sciences
Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical sciences
Colorectal cancer: Clinical sciences
Peptic ulcer disease: Clinical sciences
Cushing syndrome and Cushing disease: Clinical sciences
Diabetes mellitus (Type 2): Clinical sciences
Diabetic ketoacidosis: Clinical sciences
Hyperparathyroidism: Clinical sciences
Thyroid carcinoma: Clinical sciences
Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Clinical sciences
Angina pectoris
Aortic dissection: Clinical sciences
Approach to chest pain: Clinical sciences
Approach to hypertension: Clinical sciences
Ventricular tachycardia: Clinical sciences
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiomyopathies: Pathology review
Congestive heart failure: Clinical sciences
Coronary artery disease: Clinical sciences
Essential hypertension: Clinical sciences
Infectious endocarditis: Clinical sciences
Marfan syndrome
Mitral valve disease
Myocardial infarction
Pericarditis: Clinical sciences
Tricuspid valve disease
Buerger disease: Year of the Zebra
Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis: Clinical sciences
Approach to a cough (subacute and chronic): Clinical sciences
Approach to a cough (acute): Clinical sciences
Asthma: Clinical sciences
Community-acquired pneumonia: Clinical sciences
COVID-19: Clinical sciences
Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: Pathology review
HIV and AIDS: Pathology review
Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Clinical sciences
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Pneumonia
Pneumonia: Pathology review
Pulmonary edema
Pulmonary embolism: Clinical sciences
Tuberculosis (extrapulmonary and latent): Clinical sciences
Tuberculosis (pulmonary): Clinical sciences
Approach to vasculitis: Clinical sciences

Decision-Making Tree

Transcript

Watch video only

Cellulitis and erysipelas are acute infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Erysipelas is an infection of the upper layer of the dermis with the superficial lymphatics and vessels, while cellulitis affects the deeper layers of the dermis and the subdermal tissues. These infections usually occur when bacteria enter through breaks in the skin barrier, such as a laceration and puncture wound. The vast majority of infections are caused by beta-hemolytic Streptococci, such as Group A Streptococcus or Streptococcus pyogenes; as well as Staphylococcus aureus including methicillin-resistant or MRSA. While erysipelas is usually limited to the skin, cellulitis can sometimes present with or without systemic symptoms.

When approaching an individual with signs and symptoms suggestive of cellulitis and erysipelas, first obtain a focused history and physical examination. Alright, let’s start with erysipelas. On history, the patient might report an acute onset of skin redness, swelling, and pain usually around the face or the extremities. Notably, there won’t be systemic symptoms like fever and chills, and this is one of the main factors distinguishing erysipelas from cellulitis. A physical exam typically reveals a well-demarcated area of erythema with superficial induration that is warm and tender to touch.

Because erysipelas is a local infection, you can start the patient on oral antibiotics such as a penicillin or first-generation cephalosporin. Then, assess the response at 24 to 48 hours. If the patient shows adequate response, in other words, erythema, induration, and pain have improved, they can continue the current treatment and complete the course of antibiotics. However, if the patient has an inadequate response, assess for signs of spreading infection or abscess and consider switching the antibiotics to broaden the coverage.

Alright, now that patients with erysipelas are treated, let’s go back to history and physical and talk about patients with more severe signs of infection. Similar to erysipelas, the patient might report skin redness, swelling, and pain over the affected area. However, they may or may not present with systemic symptoms, such as fevers or chills.

On physical exam, the area of erythema is typically not well-demarcated, and induration might not always be present. Additionally, you can expect the erythematous area to feel warm to the touch or tender on palpation. If you see these findings, you should suspect cellulitis. The next step is to assess for systemic signs and symptoms. If the patient does not have either of those features, they have cellulitis without systemic symptoms.

Here is a clinical pearl for you! During the physical exam, mark the edges of the erythema with a pen. This will help you assess if the area of redness is spreading or not.

Now that you have made your diagnosis, let’s talk about management. As before, you should start the patient on empiric oral antibiotics, such as penicillin or first-generation cephalosporin. When starting antibiotics, consider coverage for beta-hemolytic Streptococci and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, which are the two most common pathogens of cellulitis. You should cover for MRSA in patients who have risk factors, such as recent hospitalization, purulent drainage, or prior MRSA infection. If you think the patient might have MRSA, you can treat them with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Now once you've started antibiotics, your next step is to assess for a response. Patients with cellulitis typically show improvement at 24 to 48 hours of beginning antimicrobial therapy. If the patient is responding adequately to treatment, evidenced by improvement in symptoms like pain and redness, you can complete the course of antibiotics.

Sources

  1. "Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis" Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2017)
  2. "Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America" Clin Infect Dis (2014)
  3. "Early Response in Cellulitis: A Prospective Study of Dynamics and Predictors" Clin Infect Dis (2016)
  4. "Route and duration of antibiotic therapy in acute cellulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and harms of antibiotic treatment" J Infect (2020)
  5. "National Trends in Incidence of Purulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Patients Presenting to Ambulatory and Emergency Department Settings, 2000-2015" Clin Infect Dis (2020)
  6. "Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary" Clin Infect Dis (2011)
  7. "Incidence of skin and soft tissue infections in ambulatory and inpatient settings, 2005-2010" BMC Infect Dis (2015)
  8. "Cellulitis: A Review" JAMA (2016)
  9. "Cellulitis" N Engl J Med (2004)
  10. "Outcomes in severe sepsis and patients with septic shock: pathogen species and infection sites are not associated with mortality " Crit Care Med (2011)