Video Case Study - Caring for Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Introduction0:00–0:34
Nurse Suleena works on a Surgical Step-Down Unit and is caring for Pedro, a 55-year-old male with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH, who was admitted two days ago following a transurethral resection of the prostate, or TURP.
Nurse Suleena goes through the steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model to make clinical decisions about Pedro’s care by recognizing and analyzing cues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes.
First, Nurse Suleena recognizes important cues, including vital signs, which are temperature 98.0 F or 36.7 C, blood pressure 140/ 90 mmHg, heart rate 88 beats per minute, respirations 20 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation 95 percent on room air.
Recognizing and Analyzing Cues0:34–2:49
Next, Nurse Suleena analyzes these cues. She knows that the CBI output should be light pink, and that blood clots and amber-colored urine in the CBI drainage bag can indicate that the irrigation rate likely needs to be increased.
Also, Pedro’s non-verbal cues and vital signs indicate he’s experiencing discomfort, which is also likely due to his ineffective urinary drainage.
Nurse Suleena: Pedro, how are you feeling after your procedure? Pedro: I’m fine.
There are no male nurses available today, but I’m going to do my best to take care of you and make you comfortable. Is there anything I can do to help you?
Pedro: I feel like I need to go to the bathroom a lot. I don’t like having the catheter.
When I’m done, I’ll check to see what medications the health care provider has ordered for your pain. Now, using the information she’s gathered, along with Pedro’s medical history, Nurse Suleena chooses a priority hypothesis of impaired urinary elimination.
Prioritizing Hypotheses, Generating Solutions, and Taking Action2:49–4:16
Then, she generates solutions to address Pedro’s urinary elimination that will include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, and she establishes the expected outcome that after intervening, Pedro will experience effective urinary elimination within one hour of treatment.
Since the catheter appears to be working well, she increases the rate of the irrigation, per her facility’s protocol, and ensures the fluid is draining properly.
Pedro: I can’t wait to feel better. Thank you for helping me.
While continuing to monitor Pedro’s CBI, Nurse Suleena administers the prescribed antispasmodic using safe medication administration principles.
She then dims the lights in his room, provides a warm blanket, and encourages him to choose soothing music to play from his electronic device.
Evaluating Outcomes4:16–4:55
An hour later, Nurse Suleena evaluates the outcome of her interventions. Pedro’s vital signs are temperature 98.4 F or 36.8 C, blood pressure 128/84 mmHg, heart rate 75 beats per minute, respirations 14 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation 100 percent on room air.
Review4:55–5:25
Alright, as a quick recap… Nurse Suleena recognized and analyzed cues related to Pedro’s urinary elimination and pain, prioritized hypotheses, and generated solutions to address this problem.
She then took action to implement pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures to address Pedro’s impaired urinary elimination and evaluated outcomes by comparing them to the expected outcome.
Since Pedro’s urinary elimination was improved, Nurse Suleena determined the plan of care was successful.
- "Adult health nursing, 9th ed." Elsevier (2023)
- "Medical-surgical nursing, 8th ed." Elsevier (2023)
- "Medical-surgical nursing: Concepts and practice, 5th ed." Elsevier (2023)
No notes for this video yet
Try adding a note below