Principles of medical ethics: Autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice
Principlism is an approach to bioethics that helps guide ethical decision-making by using the four principles of: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. These principles help clinicians think through difficult decisions when patient and family preferences, clinical recommendations, risks, benefits, and limited resources don’t align.
Let’s start with autonomy. Autonomy refers to patients’ right to self-determination, meaning the right to make decisions about their own body, health, and care. Autonomy depends on decision-making capacity. A patient must be able to understand the information presented, appreciate how it applies to their situation, reason through their options, and clearly communicate a choice. Just as important, that decision must be made voluntarily, without coercion, pressure, or manipulation from clinicians, family members, or others.
In practice, it’s important to make sure patients with decision-making capacity have the information needed to make an informed decision. This is where informed consent and informed refusal come in.
Informed consent occurs when a patient chooses a treatment after understanding their diagnosis, the proposed intervention, the risks and benefits, and any reasonable alternatives.
On the flip side, informed refusal means a patient can decline a recommended treatment, or choose no treatment, after understanding the consequences of that decision.
Both of these depend on clear communication. Patients need information that is accurate, complete, and explained in a way they can understand. That’s where truth-telling plays a key role. Clinicians have an ethical obligation to be honest about diagnoses, prognosis, and treatment options.
Confidentiality also supports autonomy. Patients are more likely to share sensitive information when they trust that it will be kept private. This trust allows them to make more informed and meaningful decisions about their care.
Now, autonomy is very important and should be respected in most situations. However, there are also situations where autonomy may be limited. For example, in emergencies when immediate treatment is needed and the patient cannot provide consent; when patients request non-standard interventions; when a patient lacks decision-making capacity; or when a decision poses a serious risk of harm to others.
Here’s a legal connection! Patients have the legal right to accept or refuse medical treatment, as long as they have decision-making capacity. However, clinicians are not legally required to provide treatments that are not medically appropriate or outside the standard of care.
Alright, let’s turn to the principle of beneficence. Beneficence means “to do good” by acting in the best interest of the patient. It focuses on promoting well-being, relieving suffering, preventing harm, and supporting their quality of life.
PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS: AUTONOMY, BENEFICENCE, NONMALEFICENCE, AND JUSTICE | ||
Key Term | Definition | Example |
Principlism | An approach to bioethics that uses four foundational principles to guide difficult clinical decisions. |
|
Autonomy | A patient's right to make voluntary decisions about their own body, health, and care. | A patient with decision-making capacity chooses to stop dialysis despite disagreement from the family and healthcare team. |
Decision-Making Capacity | The ability to understand relevant information, appreciate how it applies, reason through the options, and communicate a choice. | A patient with end-stage renal disease is alert, oriented, and demonstrates full understanding before refusing further dialysis. |
Informed Consent | A voluntary choice to receive treatment after understanding the diagnosis, proposed intervention, risks, benefits, and reasonable alternatives. |
|
Informed Refusal | A voluntary decision to decline a recommended treatment after understanding the consequences. | After learning that stopping dialysis will likely result in death, a patient declines further treatment and requests comfort-focused care. |
Truth-Telling | The ethical obligation to communicate honestly about diagnoses, prognoses, and treatment options. | A clinician explains that the patient's kidney disease will progress and that the patient will likely die soon if dialysis is stopped. |
Confidentiality | Protecting private patient information so patients can share sensitive information and make meaningful care decisions. |
|
Beneficence | Acting in the patient's best interest by promoting well-being, relieving suffering, preventing harm, and supporting quality of life. | Continuing dialysis could prolong the patient's life, while comfort-focused care could better reflect the patient's goals. |
Nonmaleficence | Minimizing unnecessary or disproportionate harm while weighing treatment risks against potential benefits. | A clinician carefully increases morphine while monitoring a hospice patient for sedation and breathing changes. |
Principle of Double Effect | An action may have an intended beneficial outcome and a foreseeable but unintended harmful outcome. | Increasing morphine is intended to relieve severe pain, although it may unintentionally cause sedation, respiratory depression, or hasten death. |
Justice | Fair treatment of patients and the appropriate, ethical distribution of healthcare resources. | Emergency department patients are prioritized according to urgency when resources are limited. |
Equality | Giving everyone the same resources or treatment regardless of differences in need or risk. | Three patients are evaluated in their exact order of arrival, regardless of symptom severity. |
Equity | Adjusting care according to differences in need, risk, and barriers to achieve fair outcomes. | A patient with crushing chest pain and shortness of breath is evaluated immediately, even though they arrived last. |
- "Ethics & Issues in Contemporary Nursing: Nursing Ethics for the 21st Century. 2nd ed. " Elsevier (2025.)
- "Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professions. 5th ed. " Elsevier (2024)
- "Health Systems Science. 2nd ed. " Elsevier (2021)
Aún no hay notas para este video
Intenta agregar una nota a continuación